-Decisions on life and living Essay Example

-Decisions on life and living Essay Christians believe that they have a responsibility to care for the world, which God has created and all the people in it. Part of Christian responsibility is to care for everybody and not discriminate against people who are different, for whatever reason. If we look at a disabled person as an outcast how are we to know they arent looking at us in the same way. Christians may not like everybody but are taught to love and care for everyone. Love thy neighbour as you love thyself. This is saying that we should treat people how we would like to be treated, if we treat people with respect and dignity they will do the same to us.Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with thy whole heart and with thy whole soul and with thy whole mind. This is saying that if you love God and everything God has done, then you should love this world that he has created and all it has in it including the people. If God has created people all different then we are obviously meant to love everybody and not look at or treat anyone as outcasts. In Genesis it says that we are all made in Gods image so we are all equal and no-one is better than anybody else, also as Christians see God as perfect they must see that he needs nothing and wants people which therefore makes all people important.Christian stewardship is to look after the world for God, however many Christians believe that it isnt just up to them and that everybody should take care of the world as they also live and use its resources. Some Christians may start to think that they shouldnt care because no-body else does, they may think why should they care for the environment when other people are destroying it.Christians believe they are responsible for looking after those who are at the end of their lives and the unborn. This may link to their opposed views to abortion and euthanasia.Christians who care and enjoy the world which God has created are showing their love for him and through their responsibilities as Christian steward looking after the earth they can show their obedience and that they will do what God wants them to.Overall Christians believe it is their responsibility to look after the environment, and care for all people without discriminating. God made all in his own image so were all equal.Abortion and Euthanasia are two of the most controversial issues that Christians are faced with.Opinions on these subjects are so divided because of the different things, which they are told in the bible for example, Exodus 20:1-17 (the Ten Commandments) You shall not kill and also genesis 1:26-7 It is not up to us to take life away. But it is up to us to be caring and responsible. We cant watch others suffering.Abortion is the termination of a pregnancy this is usually before 24 weeks of pregnancy and consists of the foetus been removed. There are many reasons a woman may want an abortion for example if the mother was raped; this is one circumstance when some Christians would regard the termination as acceptable. I f a woman has been raped and becomes pregnant there is a very high chance that abortion will seem like the only way. The mother may believe that when the child is born it will not be given the love it deserves because of the circumstances in which it was created. Also every time the woman saw her baby she would be reminded of her attack, and as well as fearing the baby would grow up like its father the mother may suffer from psychological issues due to the attack. In which case the baby would be a permanent reminder and could lead to its mother never fully recovering.But whilst many Christians believe life begins at conception and thou shalt not kill some still believe that under certain circumstances abortion is the right thing to do. Some women may want an abortion if their child is going to be born with a deformity or hereditary terminal illness but many Christians would still say that the baby deserves the chance to lead a normal fulfilling life. However if a child is born and i s need of constant care, life wouldnt be enjoyable and the parents would also find it hard spending all their time caring for their child. No-body wants to see a child grow up suffering so it would be considered compassionate to go through with an abortion.One other case in which Christians may see an abortion as acceptable is for example if the mother will die through continuing her pregnancy. Christians believe thou shalt not kill from the ten commandments and if a woman was denied the right to have an abortion despite the fact she was going to die that would be going against the beliefs of many. So in retrospect an abortion would be the right thing to do.Although there a lots of Christians who believe abortion can be considered justified and the right thing to do, many still believe that under no circumstance should a woman be granted the permission to have an abortion. This is a confusion issue for some people because there is a lot of debate about when exactly life begins. All Christians have different opinions for example some believe that life begins at conception in which case the termination of a pregnancy would be the murder of a living being. Others believe that full life doesnt begin until the baby is out of the mothers womb and surviving on its own. This means it is part of the mother until birth, so she has the right to decide what to do with her body. Also there are people who believe that life begins when the foetus has a heartbeat or has brainwaves and a central nervous system. Christians believe it is not up to us to take life away.Roman Catholics believe strongly that abortion is murder as life begins at conception, they do not believe in the use of contraception, if you are to have sex it should be because you want to have a baby. They see no exceptions for abortion. While The Church of England also have a strong opposition towards abortion they recognise that there are strictly limited conditions in which abortion may be preferable.Christi ans may be divided on their opinions of this issue because of the bible and what they have been taught to believe. The bible is a contradiction. While the Ten Commandments teach that thou shalt not kill Jesus preached compassion and forgiveness. So abortion seen as murder is obviously wrong but to show compassion for the mother of the child and forgiveness should she go through with an abortion as put many Christians in two minds about what is right or wrong and what they personally believe. Jesus never preached about abortion; he never told anyone it was acceptable nor did he say it was totally out of the question. So what Christians believe is their own opinion it cannot be proved true.However if a woman is considering an abortion she should consider every option she has in great detail, abortion is not a subject that can be taken light heartedly. Other factors to consider in the controversial issue of abortion are for example that women would still have abortions if the procedure were illegal. However it would be dangerous and in some cases life threatening as they would rely on back street clinics were the operation would be performed illegally. Although this is true, there as been research into whether or not a foetus can feel pain as it is about to die, and women may suffer from guilt for years afterwards.If thinking about abortion every option should be considered, all points of view must be taken into account. Which choice would bring more good than bad. Is an abortion really the right thing to do?Euthanasia is another controversial issue in which the opinions of Christians are very divided. Euthanasia means easy painless death. There are different types of Euthanasia, known as passive, positive and voluntary. Voluntary is a patient requesting to die when life is becoming unbearable, passive is allowing someone to die due to the lack of prevention of death. Positive is to deliberately cause the death of somebody for example in the case of Harold Shipma n. Suicide is a sin and assisting someone in dying is also wrong therefore voluntary Euthanasia is wrong under all circumstances right? In the UK the law stands that anyone who helps a person die no matter what the circumstances is an accessory to murder, so yes you would say that it was wrong. Voluntary Euthanasia is known by several names such as; assisted suicide; mercy killing and gentle easy death. Assisted suicide is when a person helps a patient to die, those who believe voluntary euthanasia is acceptable do not believe this to be suicide. Suicide is when one person kills themselves for a reason other than a terminal illness, people who try to commit suicide are often seeking attention and/or trying to escape problems such as failed relationships, abuse and stress caused from exams for example.Many Christians believe that Euthanasia is wrong under all circumstances, although one in which some Christians may see voluntary Euthanasia as acceptable is for example if a patient is in severe pain and are dying. Christians are taught to be compassionate human beings so it would be wrong to watch another person suffering. A patient shouldnt have to wake up everyday thinking well Im alive today. Also a patients family although theyd want to keep their relative alive they wouldnt want to watch them suffering, left to die painfully with each day a miracle that theyre still alive. It isnt natural to be breathing and alive thanks to a machine.Another circumstance, which may be accepted, is if a person couldnt enjoy life because of a permanent and severe disability. Some people would say that the person had the right to choose whether or not they wanted to carry on their life. If they were suffering from a disease such a Parkinsons and were totally dependent on other people they may feel humiliated and life might end up been more of a chore than something to enjoy. It cant be seen as acceptable to watch them suffering.A third circumstance in which some Christians may see voluntary Euthanasia as acceptable is for example if a persons existence is more like a vegetable. If a person is so badly injured from an accident that they are permanently brain damaged or in a coma in which it is unlikely that theyll wake up, it would be an act of compassion to end their lives. So that the suffering of the patient and their family can be taken away. Although some people disagree with this and believe that God has mapped out our lives and that he decides when life is created and he decides when it is taken away. It can not be considered the right thing to do to watch a patient and their family to sit and wait for death to happen. If we are all special to God then surely in these circumstances Voluntary euthanasia must be acceptable.In Genesis 1:26-7 we are told that we are all special to God and that it is not up to us to take life away, even in circumstances such as mentioned above. I disagree with this because it shows no love or compassion however a very r elevant argument against voluntary Euthanasia is that a patient may be in an unfit state to make such an important decision, for example if the patient is heavily medicated. They wouldnt be in the right frame of mind to make the decision whether or not they wanted to die. Also it wouldnt be right to permit Voluntary Euthanasia if a patients family dont agree that it is the right choice.Another really important factor to consider which Christians argue is whether or not peoples moral conscience would change, If Voluntary Euthanasia becomes legal doctors who help patients to die will start to feel less guilty the more times they assist someone in dying. In 1 Corinthians 6: 18-20 (body as a temple) we are told that our body is a temple that should be looked after, and no one else nor ourselves should harm it. As in voluntary euthanasia which is killing our own human body which is the most harm we can actually do. Christians are worried as to where it will lead us if voluntary euthanasi a is acceptable. Babies born with certain conditions. Will they be allowed to die? Another question on the minds of many is If Abortion is legal should Euthanasia also be legal?. If Abortion is seen as compassionate towards the mother, in cases such as the baby been born with a terminal illness in which case it wouldnt enjoy life. Then clearly Voluntary Euthanasia should be seen as an act of compassion towards a patient who has a terminal illness and no longer can enjoy life.But the Roman Catholic view states that Voluntary Euthanasia is wrong. Only God has the right to make decisions over death. Jeremiah 1: 5 says that God has mapped out our lives even before conception, we cannot end life as God may have something special for them to do even if it seems theres nothing left they can do. While The Church Of England believe that people who become ill need special care as they become vulnerable however the C.O.E also states that a person has the right to refuse treatment but under no circumstances do they have the right to choose when they die.I believe that Christians shouldnt try to make others accept their views, what they believe about life is up to them. God created people to be different therefore we all have different opinions. Everybody in the world has a different opinion on everything; even Christians have mixed views about all different controversial issues such as Abortion and Euthanasia. God created us in his own image, and God is seen as perfect and so there should be nothing wrong with Christians having their opinions, people from different religions will also have their opinions. However Christians believe that their opinions are right in all cases. They think that they arent just telling you an opinion and trying to make it your opinion also, they are telling what is right and what should be.Some children are sent to religious school such as catholic schools, they may not be religious children and in some cases may not come from religious famil ies but still are taught about religion, have to follow the rules, say prayers and are very often told what to believe.I think non-religious people make up the majority of the people who believe Christians should keep their views and opinions to themselves. Non religious people still have consciences and no whats morally right when it comes to abortions and euthanasia, however they can see circumstances in which these can be accepted. Whereas most Christians are adamant about their opinions and see no situations that should be solved by Voluntary Euthanasia or the death of innocent baby.Christians and their opinions have a big affect on peoples actions even those who are not religious. For example; Support groups for people unsure about abortion and families and patients considering Euthanasia are often run by Christians, if this is the case advice would be biased as they would want you to make the decision they would if they were in that position. Somebody who is contemplating Abor tion or Euthanasia would need an unbiased opinion and advice from an unbiased person, as they would most likely already be in a vulnerable state of mind. Christians make a person feel like it is wrong for them to make their own decision about abortion and euthanasia but there is no right or wrong decision just a decision that is morally right for a particular person and what feels right for them and their family.

From Communism To Democracy Essays - G20 Nations, Free Essays

From Communism To Democracy Essays - G20 Nations, Free Essays From Communism to Democracy Gradualism is naturally the most feasible approach to any situation. Since the fall of the iron curtain, these two Communist power houses have chose to move towards democracy. China has chosen to take the natural, more gradual approach to democracy where as Russia has chosen the fast-paced, more dangerous approach. These two nations have chosen to change their economies from a collectivized command one to a market oriented one in order to increase the ezdard of living in their countries. As we have seen in recent years, China is booming and becoming more and more successful, while Russia seems like it is regressing back to parochial ways. It is impossible to compare anything but Russia and China's approaches to change, and the results that incurred. The two nations have vastly different economies and to compare one economy to another would be illogical. China and Russia's approach to change are vastly different, almost like night and day. China's political and economic policy has always been to do things gradually. Whereas Russia believed in going through the necessary changes quickly, so that the hardship would in turn pass just as quickly. In the implementation of their policies, we have seen that China's approach has led to a 29% of growth in their industrial field. But in comparison, Russia only yielded 15% with their approach. But one must keep in mind that China has more industrial sectors than does Russia, so their job in improving industry is notably easier than Russia's feat in developing an industry. Politically, the two nations have the same policies that they held in their economies. China believes in gradually letting the people have more access to political freedom. And again, Russia's policy has been to flood them all at once with these new found freedoms. Unfortunately Russia's policy hasn't been the most naturally feasible approach again. Their people have been suddenly bombarded with all of these new found freedoms they have never experience before. They are like little children let loose in a candy store. There are all of these new things available to them, and most of the younger generation wants too try everything at once. All of these citizens experimenting with their new freedoms are creating political chaos. The Russian citizens don't have time to savor their new freedoms and are just trying to grab them from left and right. For they are probably afraid that if they don't take their freedoms quickly, they will leave as quickly as they came. On the other hand, China refuses to allow their citizens run the nation. Instead they are continuing to shun democracy. They refuse to have democratic elections, pro-democracy demonstrations, and still censor the press. They are still trying to maintain that wall that separates them from the rest of the world. From a democratic aspect, China's approach is appalling. China is refusing basic democratic rights that the Western nation citizens take for granted. China is under the misconception that they can give it's people little crumbs of freedom and keep them from wanting more. China's leaders think that they can keep controlling that many people for an undetermined amount of time, they don't realize that once the people know about a better life, nothing can stop them from pursuing that life also. So looking at Russia and China's political policies, it is safe to say that what is good for the economy may not necessarily be good for the people. When looking at evolution and physiology, one will also notice that changes naturally happen gradually. Over time, living organisms change and evolve, but the key ingredient is time. Sometimes changes take place over thousands of millions of years, as intended by nature. But when examining a change in nature that occurred spontaneously or quickly, one will notice that the change was usually a fluke, or a by-product of the interferences by mankind. China has taken the natural path, and has gradually succeeded in the short time span that it has be on the market-oriented path. On the other hand, Russia, who chose to take a fast-paced approach is suffering and has not succeeded in changing. Personally, I believe that the Russian people will

2 questions Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 4

2 questions - Assignment Example In addition, citizens working in chemical manufacturing industries may have health concerns due to exposure to chemicals for many years. The youth would be affected by such a policy because it would be hard to secure jobs in top positions. Older citizens in the workforce need to retire at the stipulated normal retirement age (67) to pave way for energetic youths (Millar, 42). Such citizens need to be engaged in physical education programs to remain active rather than retaining them in the workforce. The toy industry is common for creating gender bias to children at a tender age. For many years, boys have been playing with ‘manly’ toys with dark colors whereas girls play with ‘girly’ toys with bright colors. It is common to find boys playing with toy trucks and police vehicles while girls play with dolls. Fingers would be pointed towards Hasbro Inc. for attempting to frustrate efforts towards gender equality. Why create toys that create border on lines of gender? It would not be prudent to buy the Easy Bake Oven from Hasbro Inc. However, it would be prudent to buy the toolkit from GoldieBlox, as the toys are indiscriminative of gender. Toy companies need to mitigate gender bias by manufacturing toys that are suitable for both boys and girls. On the other hand, parents need to buy toys that enhance equality on the field of play among boys and